AIA Michigan
 

   

• Green Home Page • Contacts •

Sustainable Project

... ................................

Ford Rouge Center Industrial Redevelopment
Index:

Ford Rouge Center Industrial Redevelopment

Project Overview:

Environmental Storm Water Quality:

Green Roof: 

Energy Reduction:

Environmental Quality for Occupants:

Recycling:

Adaptive Reuse of Buildings:

Landscape Initiatives:

Reduction of Toxicity:

Awards and Certifications received to date:

 

 

Project Overview:

The core “Base Building” program for the production of the new manufacturing product at the Ford Rouge Center was found in the Heritage Program’s Body Shop and Final Assembly buildings.  The Body Shop (800,000 sf) and the Final Assembly (1,000,000 sf) buildings were tied into other existing manufacturing operations through a network of new product conveyors and utility trestles.  Site civil improvements and ancillary support structures were included in the “Base Building” program as necessary to support the new automotive product.

Artistic rendering of the site
portraying fully grown plantings

Catwalk between buildings
and over the green roof

 

Image by Ford Communications Network

The impetus toward changing the standard of industrial development inspired out-of-the-box thinking regarding every facet of the development process.  The team was to implement a number of environmental objectives into the base scope.  The concept of mechanical and electrical systems was to optimize energy with considerations for renewable sources.  The program included water treatment as a precious resource through reuse and to release into the ecosystem water that was clean and healthy.  The soils and landscape were to establish wildlife habitat.  The air was to be protected from toxic emissions by releasing only healthy emissions.  And the waste management was to be reduced for buildings and production.  The development team brought these general environmental objectives into the heart of developing the automotive program, which was valued at over three hundred million dollars.

The industrial development process and its participants have evolved from a set of standards that were based on years of manufacturing experience.  The implementation of sustainable innovations required a cultural change in the way of thinking for the team that provided a positive and proactive environment toward accepting change. The sustainable development placed higher emphasis of understanding value in terms of operating efficiencies and life-cycle cost analysis.  The sustainable development team’s role included the active participation in translating the sustainable ideals into reality.  It was necessary for each of the sustainable engineering initiatives to be packaged within a business case from which the owner was able to appropriate judgment and funding.  The team accepted sustainable change as a new major influence within the industrial development process.  The team also constantly reviewed better ways to engineer, purchase and construct the sustainable systems while providing a basis for the owner to make best practice decisions founded on the business case.  Intense scrutiny was applied to technical details, installation procedures, availability of new products, cost ramifications, and procurement. The theme was repetitive:  start with a sustainable goal and continually improve upon the method and content of achieving the sustainable goal in order to build a sustainable reality.

According to Loren Klevering of Arcadis Giffels, between the talents of all of the project professionals, the team had at their fingertips all of the expertise needed to successfully develop the chosen sustainable concepts, the graphic depiction of the concepts, the understanding of options for material selection and installation within the available technology, plus the appreciation of cost and schedule impact.  The latter consideration drove the team to take the practical actions necessary to bring the concept into construction reality as a beneficial component of the completed project.

William Kroczolowski of Arcadis Giffels explains that: “Every effort was made to hold on to the original concept. At the initiation of the project, the design team had developed a very thorough understanding of the Dearborn Truck Plant needs by going through a series of interviews and work sessions with the buildings’ end user groups. They established what were the users’ expectations, and tried to verify that they all were necessary and fell within conservative time frame and budget scenario.

During the course of the project, changes occurred that would impact the team’s ability to satisfy these expectations. Rather then abandoning the expectations, the team chose to attempt to prepare all solutions in a way that would ultimately accommodate the users’ end needs. The key word here is ultimately. In most cases a new approach was considered, where priorities had to be reestablished in order to differentiate the initial needs and the end needs. In other cases, scaled down efforts were applied in order to provide only what was needed in the foreseeable future.  In all approaches, the most important element was to keep everyone informed of the developing situations and the resulting solutions.  This was done in order to minimize the impact of surprises at the end of the project, or the first time users walked into their workspace to begin training on how to assemble accomplish their particular vehicular assembly task.”

The initial costs of incorporating sustainable initiates into an industrial project include time and capital expense.  Over time and experience, these learning curves will result in commonplace savings to future developments.  Ford has demonstrated full commitment to sustainable design within the industrial process.  This project was successfully completed not only without compromising sustainability but with an eye toward expanding the sustainable nature of the systems initially considered.  The Ford Rouge Center includes an unprecedented implementation of innovative sustainable initiatives…

(Click on logo for a complete list of sustainable systems)
Click on logo for a complete list of sustainable systems

Continue . . . >>>