Government Affairs Committee
E-Newsletter

 

Click here for a printable
copy of this newsletter

FEBRUARY/MARCH 2008

Welcome to the inaugural AIA Michigan Government Affairs Committee (AIA GAC) E-Newsletter. This bimonthly e-newsletter is designed to keep our members informed about the activities of this committee and how you can get involved.

IMPORTANT DATES TO REMEMBER
Legislative Day—April 15 (Lansing) and April 18 (Upper Peninsula)
On Tuesday, April 15 in Lansing and on Friday, April 18 in the Upper Peninsula, the AIA Government Affairs Committee (GAC) in partnership with the American Council of Engineering Companies of Michigan and Michigan Society of Professional Engineers will be hosting its signature event, AIA Legislative Day. The purpose of AIA Legislative Day is to meet with all of Michigan’s Representatives and Senators and express the profession’s interests and concerns. All members are strongly encouraged to participate. Our committee cannot function effectively without significant attendance at this event. The more participants we have, the louder our voice will be.

Attendees will be provided with information, instruction, and partners for visiting with the legislators. Food and fun also will be provided. Don’t miss this opportunity to speak directly with your elected officials, and contribute to the development of public policy. For more information, please visit http://www.aiami.com/gov_affairs_home.htm.

LEGISLATIVE BILLS UNDER CONSIDERATION
Below are details regarding current bills under consideration in the State House and Senate that could affect our industry. Further information can also be found at
http://www.mi.gov/som/0,1607,7-192- 29701_29704---,00.html. Once on the site, click on, "Michigan Legislature Website" and then enter the particular bill numbers you would like to review.

SB 865—Re-establishes the statute of limitations for malpractice claims architects and professional engineers at two years.
For as far back as records are available, the statute of limitations in Michigan for a malpractice claim against an architect has been two years from the date of the last professional service rendered.

In 1967, Michigan added a six-year “statute of repose” to protect architects from claims that were “discovered” long after a project was completed. In 1988, the Legislature passed an amendment to MCL 600.5805 to clarify which types of claims were covered by the statute of repose.

Two years ago, the Michigan Supreme Court reinterpreted the 1988 amendment and ruled that the statute of limitations for a malpractice claim against an architect should be identical to the repose period (six years from first use, occupancy or acceptance of the improvement). This ruling, known as Ostroth v. Warren Regency, greatly expanded a Michigan architect’s exposure to liability for all types of claims.

SB 865, sponsored by Senator Alan Sanborn (R-Richmond), and supported by AIA Michigan, would restore the statute of limitations for architects to a two-year period for malpractice as it was before Ostroth. The bill received a hearing on January 29, before the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Senator Wayne Kuipers (R-Holland). AIA GAC appeared and testified in favor of the bill. On that same date, SB 865 was reported out of committee to the full Senate with a recommendation for passage.

HB 4937-4938—Would increase penalties for the unauthorized practice of architecture and professional engineer.
The unauthorized practice of architecture in Michigan is currently a low-level misdemeanor. The maximum penalties available are a $500 fine and 90 days in jail for the first offense, and a $1,000 fine and one year in jail for the second offense. It is difficult to motivate local prosecutors to take cases alleging non-licensed activity, as it is perceived as an insignificant crime. The deterrent effect of the current law is minimal. Increasing the penalties for the unlicensed practice of architecture should increase the interest in prosecution, and create a greater deterrent.

HB 4937-4938 was drafted with the assistance of the bill’s sponsors, Representatives Michael Sak (DGrand Rapids) and Barbara Farrah (D-Southgate). It increases the penalties available to a maximum fine of $25,000 for each offense, while maintaining the existing jail terms for first and second offenses.

The bill also includes a new felony provision that allows for a maximum jail sentence of up to four years, if an offense results in death or serious injury. A new provision also exists that would require restitution by the offender. Lastly, the bill precludes a party from maintaining an action for compensation in Michigan’s courts, if that party was unlicensed during the performance of the services rendered.

AIA Michigan supports HB 4937-4938. The bill has already passed the Michigan House. It is currently in the Senate Economic Development & Regulatory Reform Committee, chaired by Senator Alan Sanborn (R-Richmond).

SB 106—Requires a certificate of merit be filed by a plaintiff in the event of an action against an architect or professional engineer.
Architects face liability exposure for alleged negligence or malpractice in the course of their duties. They also are likely targets of suits from injured parties, who seek relief from anyone who may even be remotely involved in an alleged death, injury or damage connected to the built environment.

Faced with such risks, most architects carry malpractice insurance and most plaintiffs’ lawyers assume so. As a result, many malpractice and negligence claims brought against architects have no basis in fact or law, but are brought for strategic reasons by plaintiffs seeking to maximize the opportunity for recovery. Defending these groundless suits are a source of considerable cost to architects in the form of increased insurance premiums, lost productive time, and tarnished professional reputation, even if the suit is eventually dismissed.

To combat this problem, several states have adopted “Certificate of Merit” laws for architects. These laws require a plaintiff to review its malpractice claim with a third party architect and confirm the claim appears to have merit before a lawsuit may be commenced. The plaintiff must file a “Certificate of Merit” in the form of a sworn affidavit from the third-party architect, along with its compliant. The purpose of the law is to serve as a prophylactic device to filter out frivolous lawsuits. SB 106 was introduced by Senator Valde Garcia (R-Howell) and carefully crafted to assure that no meritorious claims will be affected.

SB 106, which is supported by AIA Michigan, is currently in the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired by Senator Wayne Kuipers (R-Holland). SB 106 received a hearing on September 11, 2007. AIA GAC appeared and testified in favor of the bill.

HB 5356-5358—Provides the fix needed to solve the Miller v. Allstate decision
On May 31, 2007, the Michigan Court of Appeals issued its opinion in
Miller v. Allstate Ins. Co. In summary, the Court ruled that where a professional services business can be incorporated under the Michigan Professional Services Corporation Act or Professional Limited Liability Corporation Act, it must be formed under those acts.

Miller has instituted a profound change in established law and practice. In 1968, the attorney general issued an opinion that stated architects, although licensed professionals, could incorporate their businesses under the Business Corporation Act. Architects were not required to submit to the requirement that all shareholders must be licensees, which is mandatory for P.C.’s, (and for PLLC’s all members must be licensees).

For 44 years, Michigan architects have assumed non-licensees can be shareholders in an architectural firm (or members of a PLLC that provides architectural services) and have formed businesses accordingly. Under Miller, that practice is not legal, and the application of Miller is retroactive to October 1963.

HB 5356-5358, sponsored by Representatives Bill Huizenga (R-Zeeland), Andy Meisner (D-Ferndale) and Ed Clemente (D-Lincoln Park) would restore the rule that architects could chose to incorporate as an “Inc.” or “P.C.,” or as an “LLC” or “PLLC” just as it was before Miller.

AIA Michigan supports HB 5356-5358, which passed the Michigan House unanimously on December 6, 2007. The bill is currently in the Senate Economic Development & Regulatory Reform Committee, chaired by Senator Alan Sanborn (R-Richmond). HB 5356-5358 was given a hearing on January 23, 2008. AIA GAC appeared and submitted a statement of support.

HB 4770-4772—Amends Construction Code, Occupational Code and License Fee Act to license interior designers, create a state board and to allow interior designers to be issued building permits.
HB 4770-4772, sponsored by Representatives Bill Huizenga (R-Zeeland) and Andy Meisner (D-Ferndale) would establish “licensing” for interior designers and allow them to practice elements of architecture and engineering that are beyond their qualifications. HB 4770-4772 passed the Michigan House and is currently assigned to the Senate Commerce Committee, chaired by Senator Jason Allen (R-Traverse City). AIA Michigan opposes these bills and will continue to monitor their status.

GET INVOLVED
For more information on how you can become more involved with the AIA Michigan Government Affairs Committee, please contact
Gary Quesada, Hon. Aff. AIAM (248-647-9653 or gquesada@tmklawpc.com) or Kevin Shultis, AIA (313-442-8318 or Kevin.Shultis@smithgroup.com).

Government Affairs Committee E-Newsletter is a periodic electronic letter developed for AIAMI members.

We encourage you to provide feedback on the contents of E-News by e-mailing aiami@aiami.com or if you have a change of e-mail address go to our home page and remove your old email address by unsubscribing and then subscribe with your new address. For other types of updates send a note to use at aiami@aiami.com.

Do you have any comments regarding this newsletter? 
Please send them to aiami@aiami.com

If you feel you received this in error and would like to unsubscribe, go to our home page and enter your email address and click on the unsubscribe button.