Government Affairs Committee
E-Newsletter
Click here for a printable
copy of this newsletter |
|
FEBRUARY/MARCH 2008
Welcome to the inaugural AIA
Michigan Government Affairs Committee (AIA GAC)
E-Newsletter. This bimonthly e-newsletter is
designed to keep our members informed about the
activities of this committee and how you can get
involved.
IMPORTANT DATES TO REMEMBER
Legislative Day—April 15 (Lansing) and April
18 (Upper Peninsula)
On
Tuesday, April 15 in Lansing and on
Friday, April 18 in the Upper Peninsula, the
AIA Government Affairs Committee (GAC) in
partnership with the American Council of
Engineering Companies of Michigan and Michigan
Society of Professional Engineers will be
hosting its signature event, AIA Legislative
Day. The purpose of AIA Legislative Day is to
meet with all of Michigan’s Representatives and
Senators and express the profession’s interests
and concerns. All members are strongly
encouraged to participate. Our committee cannot
function effectively without significant
attendance at this event. The more participants
we have, the louder our voice will be.
Attendees will be provided with
information, instruction, and partners for
visiting with the legislators. Food and fun also
will be provided. Don’t miss this opportunity to
speak directly with your elected officials, and
contribute to the development of public policy.
For more information, please visit
http://www.aiami.com/gov_affairs_home.htm.
LEGISLATIVE BILLS UNDER CONSIDERATION
Below are details regarding current bills
under consideration in the State House and
Senate that could affect our industry. Further
information can also be found at
http://www.mi.gov/som/0,1607,7-192-
29701_29704---,00.html.
Once on the site, click on, "Michigan
Legislature Website" and then enter the
particular bill numbers you would like to
review.
SB 865—Re-establishes the
statute of limitations for malpractice claims
architects and professional engineers at two
years.
For as far back as records are
available, the statute of limitations in
Michigan for a malpractice claim against an
architect has been two years from the date of
the last professional service rendered.
In 1967, Michigan added a
six-year “statute of repose” to protect
architects from claims that were “discovered”
long after a project was completed. In 1988, the
Legislature passed an amendment to MCL 600.5805
to clarify which types of claims were covered by
the statute of repose.
Two years ago, the Michigan
Supreme Court reinterpreted the 1988 amendment
and ruled that the statute of limitations for a
malpractice claim against an architect should be
identical to the repose period (six years from
first use, occupancy or acceptance of the
improvement). This ruling, known as
Ostroth v. Warren
Regency, greatly expanded a Michigan
architect’s exposure to liability for all types
of claims.
SB 865, sponsored by Senator
Alan Sanborn (R-Richmond), and supported by AIA
Michigan, would restore the statute of
limitations for architects to a two-year period
for malpractice as it was before Ostroth.
The bill received a hearing on January 29,
before the Senate Judiciary Committee, chaired
by Senator Wayne Kuipers (R-Holland). AIA GAC
appeared and testified in favor of the bill. On
that same date, SB 865 was reported out of
committee to the full Senate with a
recommendation for passage.
HB 4937-4938—Would increase
penalties for the unauthorized practice of
architecture and professional engineer.
The unauthorized practice of
architecture in Michigan is currently a
low-level misdemeanor. The maximum penalties
available are a $500 fine and 90 days in jail
for the first offense, and a $1,000 fine and one
year in jail for the second offense. It is
difficult to motivate local prosecutors to take
cases alleging non-licensed activity, as it is
perceived as an insignificant crime. The
deterrent effect of the current law is minimal.
Increasing the penalties for the unlicensed
practice of architecture should increase the
interest in prosecution, and create a greater
deterrent.
HB 4937-4938 was drafted with
the assistance of the bill’s sponsors,
Representatives Michael Sak (DGrand Rapids) and
Barbara Farrah (D-Southgate). It increases the
penalties available to a maximum fine of $25,000
for each offense, while maintaining the existing
jail terms for first and second offenses.
The bill also includes a new
felony provision that allows for a maximum jail
sentence of up to four years, if an offense
results in death or serious injury. A new
provision also exists that would require
restitution by the offender. Lastly, the bill
precludes a party from maintaining an action for
compensation in Michigan’s courts, if that party
was unlicensed during the performance of the
services rendered.
AIA Michigan supports HB
4937-4938. The bill has already passed the
Michigan House. It is currently in the Senate
Economic Development & Regulatory Reform
Committee, chaired by Senator Alan Sanborn
(R-Richmond).
SB 106—Requires a certificate of
merit be filed by a plaintiff in the event of an
action against an architect or professional
engineer.
Architects face liability exposure for
alleged negligence or malpractice in the course
of their duties. They also are likely targets of
suits from injured parties, who seek relief from
anyone who may even be remotely involved in an
alleged death, injury or damage connected to the
built environment.
Faced with such risks, most
architects carry malpractice insurance and most
plaintiffs’ lawyers assume so. As a result, many
malpractice and negligence claims brought
against architects have no basis in fact or law,
but are brought for strategic reasons by
plaintiffs seeking to maximize the opportunity
for recovery. Defending these groundless suits
are a source of considerable cost to architects
in the form of increased insurance premiums,
lost productive time, and tarnished professional
reputation, even if the suit is eventually
dismissed.
To combat this problem, several
states have adopted “Certificate of Merit” laws
for architects. These laws require a plaintiff
to review its malpractice claim with a third
party architect and confirm the claim appears to
have merit before a lawsuit may be commenced.
The plaintiff must file a “Certificate of Merit”
in the form of a sworn affidavit from the
third-party architect, along with its compliant.
The purpose of the law is to serve as a
prophylactic device to filter out frivolous
lawsuits. SB 106 was introduced by Senator Valde
Garcia (R-Howell) and carefully crafted to
assure that no meritorious claims will be
affected.
SB 106, which is supported by
AIA Michigan, is currently in the Senate
Judiciary Committee, chaired by Senator Wayne
Kuipers (R-Holland). SB 106 received a hearing
on September 11, 2007. AIA GAC appeared and
testified in favor of the bill.
HB 5356-5358—Provides the fix
needed to solve the Miller v. Allstate decision
On May 31, 2007, the Michigan Court of
Appeals issued its opinion in
Miller v.
Allstate Ins. Co. In summary, the Court
ruled that where a professional services
business can be incorporated under the Michigan
Professional Services Corporation Act or
Professional Limited Liability Corporation Act,
it must be formed under those acts.
Miller has instituted a
profound change in established law and practice.
In 1968, the attorney general issued an opinion
that stated architects, although licensed
professionals, could incorporate their
businesses under the Business Corporation Act.
Architects were not required to submit to the
requirement that all shareholders must be
licensees, which is mandatory for P.C.’s, (and
for PLLC’s all members must be licensees).
For 44 years, Michigan
architects have assumed non-licensees can be
shareholders in an architectural firm (or
members of a PLLC that provides architectural
services) and have formed businesses
accordingly. Under
Miller, that
practice is not legal, and the application of
Miller
is retroactive to October 1963.
HB 5356-5358, sponsored by
Representatives Bill Huizenga (R-Zeeland), Andy
Meisner (D-Ferndale) and Ed Clemente (D-Lincoln
Park) would restore the rule that architects
could chose to incorporate as an “Inc.” or
“P.C.,” or as an “LLC” or “PLLC” just as it was
before
Miller.
AIA Michigan supports HB
5356-5358, which passed the Michigan House
unanimously on December 6, 2007. The bill is
currently in the Senate Economic Development &
Regulatory Reform Committee, chaired by Senator
Alan Sanborn (R-Richmond). HB 5356-5358 was
given a hearing on January 23, 2008. AIA GAC
appeared and submitted a statement of support.
HB 4770-4772—Amends Construction
Code, Occupational Code and License Fee Act to
license interior designers, create a state board
and to allow interior designers to be issued
building permits.
HB 4770-4772, sponsored by
Representatives Bill Huizenga (R-Zeeland) and
Andy Meisner (D-Ferndale) would establish
“licensing” for interior designers and allow
them to practice elements of architecture and
engineering that are beyond their
qualifications. HB 4770-4772 passed the Michigan
House and is currently assigned to the Senate
Commerce Committee, chaired by Senator Jason
Allen (R-Traverse City). AIA Michigan opposes
these bills and will continue to monitor their
status.
GET INVOLVED
For more information on how you can become
more involved with the AIA Michigan Government
Affairs Committee, please contact
Gary Quesada,
Hon. Aff. AIAM (248-647-9653 or
gquesada@tmklawpc.com)
or Kevin
Shultis, AIA (313-442-8318 or
Kevin.Shultis@smithgroup.com). |
|